Skip to content

NAD+evidence-first

The NAD Review
menu

provider_review · verified 2026-08-08

Oak review

A deep longevity menu with a price on none of it

Oak's own checkout configuration carries NAD+, glutathione, MIC+B12, sermorelin and tesamorelin — and returns zero for every one of them. It is not that Oak cannot publish a price: the first screen of the same order form prices its whole GLP-1 grid before a single question is answered, while the longevity line sits beside it as a bare category link with no figure at all.

How this site makes money

Plain version: a handful of the outbound links here are affiliate or referral links. Follow one, start a treatment or buy a product, and we may earn a commission — your price stays exactly the same. That money pays for the research, and what we write about any product — and the price you pay — are the same either way. Want the specifics? Read the full disclosure.

at_a_glance

price
Pricing not published. Oak's checkout configuration returns zero for all six of its programs, including the Anti-Aging program that carries NAD+, and every per-drug endpoint behind it returns nothing at all.
what you pay
Pricing not published. The cost is set after the quiz and after clinician approval. We are not estimating one: Oak publishes five mutually inconsistent prices for its GLP-1 line across its own hero, meta description and two comparison tables, so deriving a longevity figure from that side would be inventing a number twice over.
pharmacy
Not named, and neither is any clinician: no medical director, no prescriber, no NPI anywhere on the site. Oak's own consent JSON identifies the prescribing network as Beluga Health, which is more than the marketing pages disclose. On certification, be careful with what Oak shows you: the footer renders a locally-hosted badge image and links to LegitScript's public keyword checker, and there is no seal ID anywhere in the markup — so there is nothing anyone can verify, and this review does not describe Oak as LegitScript-certified.
states
Circular. One terms document says Oak provides its services to 45 states. A second says eligibility depends on a "States Where We Currently Operate" list "found in our FAQ" — and that FAQ does not exist. Oak publishes no such page anywhere on its site, so the list a reader is directed to is a reference to something that was never published.
on our index
Ranked #17 of 34 on our NAD+ provider index.

verdict

The short version

Oak is a correction and a criticism in one row. The correction is ours: this network had Oak recorded as a GLP-1-only seller, and its own unauthenticated checkout configuration disproves that outright — there is an Anti-Aging program whose consent text names MIC+B12, glutathione, NAD+ and metformin, a separate program selling sermorelin and tesamorelin, and topical NAD+ in the skincare line. That is a deeper injectable longevity menu than most providers here. The criticism is that not one of those products has a published price. Every longevity program in Oak's own configuration returns zero, the per-drug endpoints return nothing, and — the part that makes this a choice rather than a limitation — the SAME order form prices both compounded GLP-1 molecules openly on its first screen, with no medical question answered. Oak publishes a price when it wants to. So what NAD+ costs at Oak is knowable only by completing a quiz and being approved. On an index that ranks on price transparency, that is where this row belongs, and it is why every price cell above reads "Pricing not published" rather than a number we back-solved from the weight-loss side.

evidence

What the evidence for this route shows

Compounded NAD+ is not an FDA-approved product, and the route sold here has no randomized human trial behind it: there is no published study showing that subcutaneous or intranasal NAD+ raises blood NAD+ in people, let alone that it improves energy, focus or any aging endpoint. What the clinical literature actually supports is the oral precursor NR, which does raise blood NAD+ in controlled trials — a different molecule by a different route. Oak sells NAD+ both as an injection and as a topical in its skincare line, and the topical is the weaker of the two by a wide margin: NAD+ is a large, charged, water-loving molecule at roughly 663 Daltons, well above the rough 500-Dalton ceiling for meaningful passage through intact skin, and no published human study shows a topical NAD+ preparation raising NAD+ anywhere. The injection has no outcome trial; the topical has physics against it as well.

pricing

What it actually costs

advertised
Pricing not published. Oak's checkout configuration returns zero for all six of its programs, including the Anti-Aging program that carries NAD+, and every per-drug endpoint behind it returns nothing at all.
you pay
Pricing not published. The cost is set after the quiz and after clinician approval. We are not estimating one: Oak publishes five mutually inconsistent prices for its GLP-1 line across its own hero, meta description and two comparison tables, so deriving a longevity figure from that side would be inventing a number twice over.
the catch
The absence is the trap, and it is compounded by what Oak does publish. The hero says "No subscriptions" four times while the Terms describe a subscription fee that "may change from time to time" and explain how to cancel it. A "$200 off new patient offer" and a "Save up to 60% vs retail" banner run with no published mechanics and no base price to discount from. A discount off an unpublished price is not a discount; it is a number with nothing on the other side of it.

Other money you will meet

  • No price of any kind is published for the NAD+, glutathione, MIC+B12, sermorelin or tesamorelin programs
  • Refunds are refused once a prescription has been sent to the pharmacy, explicitly including attempts to stop or return the shipment with the courier
  • Binding AAA arbitration with class actions waived
  • A "$200 off" offer and a "save up to 60%" banner run with no published mechanics

source :: no figure could be read on 2026-08-08. We do not print one we did not see.

fit

Who this is and is not for

Buy it if

  • You want sermorelin and tesamorelin from one provider — a combination almost nothing else here offers
  • You want NAD+ alongside glutathione and MIC+B12 under a single intake rather than as separate purchases
  • You are willing to complete a quiz and a clinician review before learning the price
  • You want a topical NAD+ or GHK-Cu option beside the injectable line

Look elsewhere if

  • You want to know what it costs before handing over a medical history — no figure exists anywhere for any non-GLP-1 product
  • You want to know which company you are contracting with: six different legal entities are named across Oak's own site, four of them on one terms-of-use page
  • You want to check state eligibility first — the Terms point at an FAQ that does not exist
  • You want a named pharmacy, a named clinician, or a verifiable certification: Oak publishes none of the three

included

What is inside the price

consult
A clinician review is part of the flow — it is the gate the price sits behind — but nothing published says whether it is charged, bundled, or free.
labs
Not mentioned in either direction on the pages or in the configuration we read.
follow-ups
Not published.
human support
Not published as a program.
supplies
Not published.
shipping
Not priced. The refund clause names FedEx, so shipping exists; what it costs is not stated.

the_knock

What they would rather you skipped

Oak asks for a completed medical quiz and a clinician review before it will tell you what anything costs, and everything a reader might use to decide whether to do that is either missing or contradicted. Six different legal entities are named across Oak's own site — four on one terms-of-use page, the fourth of those inside a second, separately dated Terms of Use appended below the first, with two more again in the homepage footer — so the question of which company you are contracting with has six answers, none of them labeled as the one that binds. The Terms make state eligibility depend on a list "found in our FAQ", and there is no FAQ — Oak publishes no such page anywhere on its site, so the state list is a reference to something that was never published. The hero says "No subscriptions" four times while the Terms describe a subscription fee that may change. The Women's Health tile on the homepage routes into the Anti-Aging intake — the NAD+ and glutathione one — and there is no women's-health questionnaire in the catalog at all, so a woman clicking "Women's Health" lands in a longevity funnel. And the refund clause is the hardest here: once a prescription has gone to the pharmacy the order cannot be canceled or refunded, explicitly including any attempt to stop, hold, reroute or return the shipment with the courier. We are paid a commission when a reader starts care through our link to Oak, which is exactly why the row above says "Pricing not published" rather than a figure we could have guessed at.

And the rest

  • No price is published for NAD+ or for any other non-GLP-1 program — not a floor, not a range, not a "starting at"
  • Six legal entities are named across the site: four on one terms-of-use page — the last inside a second Terms appended below the first — plus two more in the homepage footer
  • State eligibility depends on a list the Terms say is in an FAQ that does not exist; a second document says 45 states
  • No pharmacy, no clinician, no medical director and no NPI is published anywhere
  • No LegitScript seal ID exists in the markup — only a locally-hosted badge and a link to the public checker, so nothing is verifiable and we do not call Oak certified
  • The hero says "No subscriptions" four times while the Terms describe a subscription fee that may change
  • The Women's Health tile routes into the NAD+ and glutathione intake, and no women's-health questionnaire exists in the catalog
  • Refunds are refused outright once a prescription reaches the pharmacy, including attempts to stop the shipment with the courier

tools

Work out your own number

visit Oak

Every figure on this page was read on Oak’s own site on 2026-08-08 in a browser that runs JavaScript, and prices change without notice. Compare it against the rest of the field on our NAD+ provider index, or read every provider review.

Medical disclaimer: This content is for general educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a licensed healthcare professional before starting, stopping, or changing any treatment.